SUBASH SUNAR

Response
Paper 20

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Our ancient reviews
our metaphors. New historicism and cultural materialism are the procedures of regeneration of our past. This kind
of work is supported out for numerous purpose. New historicism shows that every
period has its own theoretical and philosophical structures. People in the past had no idea about the God, individual
or authenticity as we do now. Cultural materialism wants to display that our
political and philosophical systems operate images and texts of the past. It serves
their welfares and that these images and text can be understood by drastic
different substitutions that are often created by placing those images or text
in their historical background. Both new historicism and cultural materialism
are concerned at the beginning of the concept of “difference”. This concept has
become significant in explaining how both critical practices have changed in
last years. Both were fascinated in highlighting the extent to which the past
differs from the modern uses of the past, to what range the past is alien or
“different” from our modern episteme and, borrowing from Foucault and
Geertz, new historians and cultural materialists.

            Hayden
White notice fiction as a lingual written statement in a style that has an event in a way that gave them
logic and understanding in his “Historical Text as Literary Artifact”. Hayden
White argues that the same series of sequential events could be talked about in
different ways by highlighting the different parts of the series of events, an
action that calls “emplotment”. Hayden
White does not mean with this interference or change in the order of historical
events in historical narrative, but simply with a different structure of the
same series of events, considering essentially literary conventions and through
the different emphasis of different
events. Hayden White lists four main types of plots, tragedy, satire, comedy, and romance.